Posts

Showing posts from 1996

Letter to HIS ex...

Juanita,

Keith said I could call you, but I have opted to write you instead. I am writing to formally request that you deal WITH ME, not Keith, if you have a problem WITH ME.

I have NO IDEA why you chose to hate me so much. I have never done anything to you that didn't warrant a "Higher Power" ie: the police, to get involved.  Your issues WITH ME, need to be dealt with separately, with your letters and phone calls to Keith should be about the health, education and welfare of your kids together, ONLY. You don't need to be calling Keith to WHINE to him about things I DO. My calling the kids is not impediment on their lives. When I called them yesterday, all they were doing was watching tv-no harm. I don't call all the time, but I do genuinely care about the kids, after all, they are my stepchildren now, and since I take my wedding vow's seriously, they will be my stepchildren for a LONG time. I'm sure it's the same for your husband, who is their stepdad…

Phone Recordings

GEESUS!!! Due to ALL the harassing phone calls we have recieved from my husbands ex wife, and making police reports for them, we were told to send the ex a letter letting her know that all future conversations will be recorded. KNOWING this, if she continues to talk, it's on her.

Keith sent her a letter dated July 1, 1996, under phone calls, he wrote, "DO NOT EVER have the children call me "person to person collect" again. It was very unnecessary for you to do it that way. It has never been a problem having them call me direct, especially since you "enforce it that they call me at least once a week." You having them call me was inappropriate and uncalled for in this manner. Lastly, all future phone conversations with you will be recorded."

She knew we were recording and she still continued to call, even one time saying she doesn't agree. She wouldn't hang up though, she kept right on talking, so... Unfortunately, she told the kids that THEIR c…

Uncovered Medical- Dental Expenses

Image
MY OH MY! If it wasn't one thing, it was ANOTHER...

My husbands divorce was final Nov 29, 1990. At that time, he had defaulted on his divorce, (more on that at another time) but his ex wife never requested payment for uncovered expenses, so really, she has no room to complain.

While they were married, my husband carried Rubell Helm insurance. I don't know when that was dropped, but what I DO know is that from Jan 1990 to May 1990 my husbands kids were covered under Kaiser through their mother, possibly through work.  I also know that according to a letter the ex wrote on June 22, 1990 that Welfare was taking care of the kids medical, but at work one month, she "recieved some extra pay for selling accounts" which put her "over the amount" that she "could earn and they stopped the welfare." The kids were covered again from Jan 1991- Mar 1993, under their mother again, and again, possibly through work.

My husband started working steady at the Post Of…

Very Interesting case

http://law.justia.com/cases/california/caapp4th/15/41.html

There were also write ups in the San Diego Union Tribune in June 1992. December 1992, April 1993 and December 1993

Hubby's ex knew at least ONE person in this case, and this person was involved in two cases, ECR1101 and CR131641. The case CR131641, against this one person that my husband's ex knew, is 11 volumes, so we were not to get a copy of that.

Case ECR1101 ex's friend was arrested 12/29/88 and pled not guilty. He changed his plea 4/3 89 to Guilty, to HS 11351-count 1, and count 2 HS 11350(A) and count 3 HS11550 were both dismissed.

Case CR131641, ex's friend was arrested June 2, 1992. In Oct 1992, he pled guilty. Hubbys ex appeared before the grand jury and her friend went into the WPP, and in Feb 1993, ex moved out of state.

The beginning of "Legal Action"

Image
After finding out that my husband was not listed as Father in his kids medical, dental, school or child care files, his ex wife fires off this letter, dated 1-12-96, not addressed to anyone in particular, pretty stupid actually, and I do believe this was the first "threat" of her taking legal action, where I am concerned.

Throughout the years, it became a CONSTANT threat, one that she never ever pursued, guess she realized she REALLY had no leg to stand on.

Yes, you ARE THE MOTHER of those two kids, and you have physical custody of them. ALL that means is
definition of sole physical custody: the order for custody where one parent has primary responsibility for the day-to-day care and supervision of the children.  http://law-dictionary.clearpointlaw.com/s/sole-physical-custody_Sta.aspx
but you share JOINT LEGAL CUSTODY of the kids with my husband. What THAT means is  Legal Custody Legal custody of a child means having the right and the obligation to make decisions about a chi…